Skip to main content

A longitudinal study on the occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in dogs during their first year of life



The primary aim of this study was to obtain more knowledge about the occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in young dogs in Norway.

The occurrence of these parasites was investigated in a longitudinal study by repeated faecal sampling of dogs between 1 and 12 months of age (litter samples and individual samples). The dogs were privately owned and from four large breeds. Individual faecal samples were collected from 290 dogs from 57 litters when the dogs were approximately 3, 4, 6, and 12 months old. In addition, pooled samples were collected from 43 of the litters, and from 42 of the mother bitches, when the puppies were approximately 1 and/or 2 months old.


The samples were purified by sucrose gradient flotation concentration and examined by immunofluorescent staining.


128 (44.1%) of the young dogs had one or more Cryptosporidium positive samples, whilst 60 (20.7%) dogs had one or more Giardia positive samples. The prevalence of the parasites varied with age. For Cryptosporidium, the individual prevalence was between 5.1% and 22.5%, with the highest level in dogs < 6 months old, and declining with age. For Giardia, the individual prevalence was between 6.0% and 11.4%, with the highest level in dogs > 6 months old, but the differences between age groups were not statistically significant. Significant differences in prevalences were found in relation to geographic location of the dogs. Both parasites occurred at low prevalences in Northern Norway.


Both Cryptosporidium and Giardia are common in Norwegian dogs, with Cryptosporidium more prevalent than Giardia. Prevalences of the parasites were found to be influenced by age, geographical location, and infection status before weaning.


Giardia and Cryptosporidium are intestinal protozoan parasites of animals and humans, causing asymptomatic to severe intestinal infections, depending on the virulence of the Cryptosporidium or Giardia isolate involved and the immunological capabilities of the hosts. Cryptosporidium infections are common in humans and calves, but also occur in dogs, cats, pigs, horses, sheep, goats and wildlife [1]. Giardia infections are common in humans and livestock, but also occur frequently in dogs, cats and numerous species of wild mammals and birds [2]. Studies on the prevalence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in other animal species in Norway have shown a prevalence of 49% and 12%, respectively, in dairy calves between 0–6 months of age [3]. Among wild cervids (moose, reindeer, roe deer and red deer) the prevalence of Cryptosporidium was found to range between 0% and 6.2% in the different species, and the prevalence of Giardia was found to be between 1.7% and 15.5% in the different species [4]. In 684 litters of suckling piglets the prevalences were found to be 8.3% Cryptosporidium positive and 1.5% Giardia positive [5]. In Norwegian red fox (Vulpes vulpes), a Cryptosporidium prevalence of 2.2% and a Giardia prevalence of 4.8% were found [6].

Currently there are 14 commonly accepted species of Cryptosporidium [79]. Dogs can be naturally infected by Cryptosporidium canis, C. parvum and C. meleagridis [10, 11]. C. canis infections in dogs are usually asymptomatic, but may cause severe diarrhoea, malabsortion and weight loss [12].

There are currently six recognized species of Giardia, but only Giardia duodenalis is known to infect multiple host species, including humans [13, 14]. Molecular genetic studies have demonstrated that G. duodenalis is a species complex comprising at least 7 major genotypes/assemblages [15]. Most of these assemblages appear to have distinct host associations. Genotyping of Giardia isolates from dogs has shown that Giardia from Assemblages A, B, C and D may occur in this host [1618]. Traub et al. (2005) [19] found genetically identical isolates in a dog and two humans in the same household, indicating zoonotic transmission between humans and dogs. The majority of Giardia infections in dogs are asymptomatic, but some infected dogs may suffer from acute or chronic diarrhoea, weight loss, poor weight gain despite a normal appetite, and, less commonly, vomiting and lethargy [20]. The Parasitology laboratory at the Norwegian School of Veterinary Science (NVH) has sporadically diagnosed both Cryptosporidium and Giardia from several domestic species, including dogs. The aim of this study was to obtain more knowledge about the occurrence of these two parasite genera among young Norwegian dogs.



Norwegian breeders of Labrador Retrievers, Newfoundland Dogs, Leonbergers and Irish Wolfhounds had been recruited by the Department of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, at NVH, to participate in a large clinical study regarding associations between dog breed, growth rate, nutrition, and skeletal disease, from birth until 24 months of age [2123]. The dogs in the present study were a sub-set of more than 600 dogs participating in the clinical investigation outlined above, and were monitored from approximately one month of age until about 12 months of age.

The overall sampling period was between November 1999 and July 2002. The breeders were asked to provide a faecal sample from the bitch and a pooled sample from the litter when the puppies were about 1 and 2 months old, and to recruit the new owners of the puppies to participate in the study (the dogs were delivered to their new owners at approximately 8 weeks old). The new owners of the puppies were asked to collect a faecal sample from their dogs when the dogs were approximately 3, 4, 6, and 12 months old. The samples were sent to the Parasitology Lab at the NVH, Oslo, with information about date of sampling, dog identity (name, date of birth, breed) and the name and address of the owner. The samples were kept refrigerated from arrival until processing at the lab. For each dog, only one sample was included in each age group. If two samples from the same dog were provided within an age group, the sample that was collected when the dog was closest to the "ideal age" in the group (i.e. 3-, 4-, 6- or 12-month-old) was included in the study and the other sample excluded. When dogs were found to be Giardia- positive the owners were recommended to treat their dogs with fenbendazole (50 mg/kg on 3 consecutive days).

In total, the material consisted of 1–4 faecal samples from each of 290 individual pure-bred, privately-owned, household dogs originating from 57 different litters, giving a total of 887 samples. There were 142 male dogs, 147 female dogs and one dog with unknown sex. Each litter consisted of 1–11 puppies (mean 5.1, median 5). In addition there were a total of 75 pooled-samples from 43 different litters and a total of 69 individual samples from 41 different mother bitches. The ages of the mother bitches were between 27 and 93 months. Seven breeders participated with more than one litter during the course of the study, 6 with 2 litters (total of between 8 and 16 dogs), and one breeder participated with dogs from 3 litters (total of 4 dogs).

Some of the owners/breeders missed one or more requested sampling occasions for unknown reasons. Thus the number of samples included in the different age groups differs from the overall number of participating dogs, litters or bitches. The actual numbers on which the calculations were based are given in the Tables or in the text.

For some analyses the dogs were divided into 3 groups: originating from a litter with negative samples; originating from a litter that had been found positive for Cryptosporidium and/or Giardia; or originating from a litter with unknown status (i.e. that had not been sampled when still in the litter, but only as individual dogs).

Sample analysis

The faecal samples were analyzed by a sucrose flotation concentration and immunofluorescent staining method as described by Olson et al. (1997) [24], and modified as described by Hamnes et al. (2006) [3]. Briefly; each pooled sample was thoroughly mixed, then a small amount of faeces (average weight, 2.9 g) was suspended in approximately 10 ml of phosphate buffered saline solution (PBS; 0.9% NaCl, pH 7.2) and mixed to a homogenous suspension. The suspension was then filtered through a surgical gauze sponge to yield approximately 7 ml of filtrate. The filtrate was layered on top of 5 ml of 1 M sucrose (specific gravity 1.13) for clarification and centrifuged at 800 × g for five minutes to concentrate the cysts/oocysts. The interface and the upper layer of liquid were carefully collected with a pipette and transferred to a clean tube and recentrifuged (800 × g; 5 min). The supernatant was decanted and the pellet resuspended in PBS to a volume of 1 ml. Thirty μl volumes of the suspension were air-dried to microscope slides, methanol fixed and stained with fluorescein-labelled (FITC) monoclonal antibody to oocysts of C. parvum and cysts of G. duodenalis (A100FR FLR Aqua-Glo from Waterborne Inc, New Orleans, USA). After incubation, excess antibody was washed off and the slides air-dried before mounting (DABCO/glycerol mounting medium 2%) with a 22 × 22 mm cover slip. The area under the cover slip was examined using an epifluorescent microscope (Leica DMLB) at 200× and 400× magnification, using an I3 filter with blue excitation and band pass filter (BP) 450 – 490 nm. With each batch of stained slides a known positive sample was stained and used as a control.

Samples were classified as negative (no cysts/oocysts found), or positive, the latter being graded as 1+ when < 5 cysts/oocysts on average were present in each of 20 fields of view, as 2+ with 5 to 10 cysts/oocysts on average in each of 20 fields of view, or as 3+ with > 10 cysts/oocysts on average in each of 20 fields at 400× magnification, respectively. The size of some of the cysts/oocysts was measured with a calibrated eyepiece graticule to ensure that they were within the size range given for Cryptosporidium and Giardia. A portion of the original faecal sample was also examined by a standard egg counting technique for helminth eggs and Isospora oocysts.

Detection level of method

Ten 3-gram faecal samples were seeded with either 100, 1000 or 5000 cysts/oocysts per gram faeces and processed according to the method described above. For Giardia, 10/10 samples were found positive in all 3 seeding categories. For Cryptosporidium, 7/10 samples seeded with 100 oocysts per gram were found positive, and 10/10 samples seeded with either 1000 or 5000 oocysts were found positive. Thus, this method has a detection level of 100 Giardia cysts and at least 1000 Cryptosporidium oocysts per gram when 3 grams of faecal material are examined.

Statistical analyses

Statistical tests included χ2 and Fishers' Exact test for analyzing 2 × 2 contingency tables, odds ratio calculations, t-test for comparisons of means, and confidence interval calculations. Differences were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05.

The prevalences of Cryptosporidium and/or Giardia were evaluated with respect to age, intensity of infection, infection status before weaning (positive/negative/unknown), geographical distribution (in which part of Norway the dog was raised), number of samples provided from each dog, sex, seasonal differences, and multiple parasitic infections.


Litters and bitches

Of the 40 litters examined at one month of age, only one litter (2.5%) was found to be Cryptosporidium positive, whereas 2 litters were Giardia positive (5.0%). Of the 39 bitches sampled at the same time as their puppies, none were Cryptosporidium positive. One bitch was Giardia positive (2.6%), but her litter was not Giardia positive on that occasion.

Of the 35 litters examined at two months of age, eight (22.9%) were positive for Cryptosporidium, whereas none was Giardia positive. Of the 29 bitches sampled at this time, one (3.4%) was Cryptosporidium positive, and her litter was also Cryptosporidium positive at that time. None of the bitches were positive for Giardia at this sampling.

Individual dogs

Prevalences of the two parasites in each age group, including the litters, are given in Table 1.

Table 1 Prevalences of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in dogs in different age groups

Of the total of 887 samples from 290 individual dogs, 149 (16.8%) were positive for Cryptosporidium. One hundred and twenty-eight (44.1%) of the dogs had one or more Cryptosporidium positive samples (109, 17, and 2 dogs had 1, 2, or 3 positive samples respectively) during the study (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Cryptosporidium positive dogs. Diagram showing the number of dogs that were positive for Cryptosporidium at 3, 4, 6 and 12 months of age, or at more than one sampling.

Seventy-three (8.2%) of the 887 samples were positive for Giardia, and 60 (20.7%) dogs had one or more Giardia positive samples (49, 9, and 2 dogs had 1, 2, or 3 positive samples respectively) during the study (Figure 2). Of the 290 dogs, 153 (52.7%) had one or more samples with Cryptosporidium and/or Giardia (Figure 3) during the study.

Figure 2

Giardia positive dogs. Diagram showing the number of dogs that were positive for Giardia at 3, 4, 6 and 12 months of age, or at more than one sampling.

Figure 3

Occurrence of Cryptosporidium and/or Giardia among the positive dogs. Diagram showing the number of dogs that were positive for Cryptosporidium and/or Giardia during the study.

Age differences – intensity of infection

Cryptosporidium was most prevalent among the youngest dogs with the prevalence declining with age (Tables 1 and 2). Individual dogs in the 3- and 4-month-old groups had significantly higher prevalences of Cryptosporidium than the older dogs (p-values between 0.02 and < 0.0001). Dogs in the 6-month-old group had a significantly higher prevalence of Cryptosporidium than dogs in the 12-month-old group (p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the prevalence of Giardia when comparing the four age groups. Among the 226 dogs that were sampled at both 3 and 4 months, 26.5% of the 3-month-old Cryptosporidium positive dogs were also positive at 4 months. For Giardia, 31.6% of the 3-month-old Giardia positive dogs were also positive at 4 months. Cumulative prevalence and percentage of new positives for both parasites in the different age groups are given in Table 2.

Table 2 Cumulative prevalence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia and percentage of new positives in different age groups of dogs

Results on level of intensity of infection related to age are given in Table 3. Within the different age groups there were no significant differences between the mean age of the positive and negative animals, or between the positive ones for the two parasites.

Table 3 Intensity of infection with Cryptosporidium and Giardia in dogs related to average age. All samples from individual dogs.

Geographical distribution

Among the litters, the majority was born in Eastern (58%) and Western Norway (21%), but the puppies were sold to owners all over the country, with a high degree of geographical dispersal of dogs from the different litters; for instance, the 18 dogs living in Oslo County originated from 13 different litters. For the whole country (19 counties), the average number of dogs from each litter represented in a county was 1.5 (1.0–3.3 dogs). When comparing the prevalences in the different regions and counties with each other (a dog being classified as positive if the actual parasite was identified in the dog during the course of the study), dogs living in Northern Norway had the lowest prevalences of both parasites (Table 4). There was a significantly higher percentage of Cryptosporidium positive individuals among dogs in Eastern Norway compared with dogs in Northern Norway (p = 0.0063, OR = 3.61) or Western Norway (p = 0.0271, OR = 1.97), as well as in dogs in Mid Norway compared with dogs in Northern Norway (p = 0.0145, OR = 4.29).

Table 4 Prevalences of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in dogs related to the geographical location of the participating dogs

For Giardia there was a significantly higher percentage of Giardia positive dogs among dogs from Eastern Norway compared with dogs from Northern Norway (p = 0.0096, OR = 8.91), and in dogs from Southern Norway compared with dogs from Northern Norway (p = 0.0094, OR = 11.00). Significantly fewer dogs from Northern Norway were Giardia positive than were dogs from other parts of the country (p = 0.0139, OR = 0.12).

Seasonal differences

There appeared to be a tendency towards higher prevalences of both parasites in winter, but no definite conclusions about this could be made due to the clustered nature of the data.

Number of samples provided from each dog

The likelihood of a dog being detected as positive increased with increasing number of samples examined. Thus, dogs from which only one sample was examined had a significantly lower prevalence of Cryptosporidium than dogs represented by more than one sample. For Giardia, the only significant difference was found between 2 and 4 samples, but there was a substantially higher prevalence of Giardia in dogs represented by 3 or 4 samples than in those with fewer samples (Table 5).

Table 5 Prevalence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia related to number of samples from each dog

Infection status before weaning

The dogs were divided into 3 different groups according to whether they came from a litter that had tested positive for Cryptosporidium and/or Giardia at 1 or 2 months of age, from a litter that was negative at 1 and 2 months of age, or from a litter with unknown litter status (litters not sampled). Comparing these groups revealed that dogs from positive litters and dogs with unknown litter status had a significantly higher prevalence of Cryptosporidium at 3 months of age than dogs from negative litters (p = 0.04, OR = 2.32 and p = 0.01, OR = 2.61, respectively). No significant differences were found in the other age groups, or for Giardia in any of the four age groups.


No significant differences in the prevalences of Cryptosporidium and Giardia were found between male and female dogs. Among the female dogs 45.5% were Cryptosporidium positive at some point in the study, whereas 43.7% of the male dogs were Cryptosporidium positive. For Giardia, 22.1% of the female and 19.7% of the male dogs were Giardia positive at some point in the study.

Multiple parasitic infections

Thirty-five dogs were positive for both parasites during the study, either at the same sampling (15 dogs) or at different samplings (data not shown). Twenty-five (27.3%) of the 128 Cryptosporidium positive dogs were also positive for Giardia at some point, whereas 25 (15.4%) of the 162 Cryptosporidium negative dogs, were Giardia positive. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0190, OR 2.06). Eighty-seven percent of these dogs were Cryptosporidium positive before or concurrent with their Giardia infection(s). Among these dogs, 31.4% had Cryptosporidium and/or Giardia at more than one sampling (i.e., 2 or 3 positive samples), whereas among the dogs being diagnosed with only one parasite, 13.6% were found positive more than once. This difference was significant (p = 0.0223, OR = 2.92). Eight (22.8%) of the 35 dogs that were positive for both Cryptosporidium and Giardia were also diagnosed with ≥100 eggs per gram faeces (EPG) of other intestinal parasites (Toxocara canis and/or Toxascaris leonina) 1–3 times during the study (data not shown), whereas 11 (9.3%) dogs with either Cryptosporidium or Giardia, and 10 (7.3%) dogs negative for Cryptosporidium or Giardia had ≥100 EPG of nematode eggs. The differences in prevalence of nematode infections between the Cryptosporidium and Giardia positive dogs and the two other groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05).


The prevalence of Giardia in individual dogs ranged between 6.9% and 11.4% in the different age groups examined, and the Cryptosporidium prevalence ranged between 5.1% and 22.5%. This is within the range reported in other studies. Thus, the prevalence of Giardia in dogs has been found to be between 5.4% and 55.2% [2532], whereas the prevalence of Cryptosporidium has been reported to range from 0% to 44.8% [33, 26, 34, 29, 35, 36, 31].

The prevalences of both Cryptosporidium and Giardia are variable in different hosts and within the same host species, and depend on a number of factors including age, living conditions, diagnostic methodology and region studied. Other factors that also might influence the prevalences are season, purebred/mixed bred, feeding, urban/rural living conditions, single or multiple household dogs, treatment, and immune status. These variables must be kept in mind when comparing the results from different studies, as well as the fact that the dogs in this study originated from only 57 litters. Thus, the littermates might have shared a common infection source (kennel/breeder) that might have affected the results at 3 and possibly 4 months old.

It is interesting, but not surprising, that the occurrence of Cryptosporidium among the dogs at 3 months old was found to be associated with infection status of the litter before weaning. In addition to the known positive litters, several other litters/individual dogs had apparently become infected with Cryptosporidium and/or Giardia between litter sampling at 2 months of age and individual sampling at 3 months, both among litters with unknown status and among previously negative litters. The higher Cryptosporidium prevalence among dogs from positive litters at 3 months old may suggest that it takes some time for the puppies to rid themselves of the infection, which is consistent with the findings of Lloyd and Smith (1997) [37], that some dogs may shed Cryptosporidium oocysts for more than 80 days. They also found that the oocysts shedding was intermittent with several peaks in all the 6 participating dogs, and 5 out 6 dogs shed oocysts for more than 60 days after becoming infected.

Several dogs in the current study were infected with the parasites at more than one sampling. This may be due to chronic infections or re-infection. The dogs that had one or more negative samples in between the positive samples may either have been re-infected or might have had a continuous infection with intermittent shedding of cysts/oocysts or shedding below the detection limit of the method used. One would also expect that the stress associated with weaning and moving to a new environment may have compromised the immune system of the puppies and made them more susceptible to infection or less able to rid themselves of an already existing infection, thus contributing to the high prevalences in the youngest dogs. Since genotyping of Cryptosporidium and Giardia was not performed during this study, it is not possible to determine whether the dogs diagnosed with either of these parasites more than once had a persistent infection with the same species (C. canis/C. parvum) or genotype (Giardia duodenalis assemblages A, B, C, D) or whether they had been re-infected with another species/genotype in between samplings. Autoinfection is known to occur for Cryptosporidium and reinfection with Giardia is also common. Little is known about the extent to which acquired immunity after an infection with a particular Cryptosporidium species or Giardia duodenalis genotype will protect against infection with another species or genotype. Findings in cattle [3841] have shown that different Cryptosporidium species predominate in different age groups. This may suggest that an infection with C. parvum does not provide immunity against C. bovis, C. andersoni and Cryptosporidium deer-like genotype. Giardia is known to induce poor immunity in the host and re-infections frequently occur, as documented in cattle [42].

Many dogs were found to be both Cryptosporidium and Giardia positive during the course of the study, which is to be expected due to the similar epidemiology of these parasitic infections and the repeated sampling regimen used in the current study. It may, however, also be suggested that some dogs are more susceptible to parasitic infections than others. In the present study, dogs that were positive for both Cryptosporidium and Giardia also had a significantly higher prevalence of helminth infections than dogs that were negative for one or both parasites. It is also possible that some of the dogs lived in a contaminated environment with a high possibility of becoming (re)infected.

The results herein show that the prevalences of Cryptosporidium varied significantly with the age of the dogs, but also with the number of samples examined from each animal (Tables 1, 2 and 5), this is as expected, as increasing the sampling frequency obviously increases the possibility of detecting an infection. The shedding of Giardia cysts is known to be intermittent and the general recommendations for diagnosis is examination of 3 samples collected during a limited time span (i.e. from a day to a week) to enhance the chances of detecting infection. Cryptosporidium might also be shed intermittently in dogs [30], so that a single sample testing regimen (one sample from each dog in each age category) as used in this study is likely to underestimate the prevalence of both parasites, but in particular Giardia. The prevalence remained high in the 3- and 4-months-old group and then declined. Cryptosporidium has been reported to occur commonly in dogs less than six months of age, whereas adult dogs are less frequently infected [43].

For Giardia the highest prevalence was found among dogs in the 12-months-old group, but differences in the prevalence between the different age groups were not significant. As the dogs became older, the percentage of new positives increased (Table 2). Cross-sectional studies have shown Giardia to be most prevalent among dogs less than 6 months of age [28, 35]. However, Huber et al. (2005) [35] examined only 35 dogs of less than 6 months of age. Kirkpatrick (1988) [31] examined faecal samples from 2294 dogs presented to a veterinary teaching hospital, and found the highest Giardia prevalence in dogs less than 2 years old. Fontanarrosa et al. (2006) [28] found that the prevalence of Giardia was higher in pure-breed dogs than in mixed-breed dogs. The prevalence of Giardia in the current study also varied with the dog age and the number of samples examined from each dog, but not to the same extent as for Cryptosporidium.

The mother bitches were not positive for Giardia or Cryptosporidium at the same time as their puppies, except for one concurrent Cryptosporidium infection of a bitch and her litter. However, due to the lack of genotyping data it is impossible to determine whether the bitches and litters were infected with the same species/genotype or whether the infections were unrelated.

The prevalences of both parasites were found to be higher in winter than in spring and summer, but this finding must be interpreted with caution due to the (clustered) nature of the data in the present study. There may be a tendency towards a higher prevalence of the parasites in winter, but this tendency cannot be separated from the effect that several positive dogs from one or more litters would have had on the results within a season, and one cannot say with any degree of certainty that the differences were truly related to season. Several other studies have found seasonal differences in the prevalence of Giardia in dogs [44, 27, 28, 31, 17], but Nolan and Smith (1995) [45] did not.

There were significant differences in the prevalence of both parasites between different regions in Norway. These differences might be due to demographic patterns and variations in density of dogs. Eastern Norway, which had the highest prevalences of both parasites, also had the highest number of dogs (2.4) per km2, whereas Northern Norway had the lowest density with 0.4 dogs/km2 [46, 47]. Moreover, the low prevalences of both parasites in Northern Norway may be related to a mostly rural demographic pattern in combination with harsh climatic conditions, which offers less opportunities for dog-to-dog contact (directly or indirectly) and thus a reduced probability of exposure to infective cysts/oocysts. Kirkpatrick (1988) [31] found that an urban locality gave a higher risk of parasitic infection compared with a non-urban locality. Since G. duodenalis of Assemblage A occurs in a wide range of mammalian hosts, including humans, livestock, wild animals and pets, such as cats [13], dogs might also become infected with Giardia from sources other than dogs. Climatic differences might also influence the prevalence of the parasites in the different areas. Northern Norway usually has long cold winters. Studies by Robertson and Gjerde (2004, 2006) [15, 48] suggested that Giardia and Cryptosporidium have only limited survival in the environment under Norwegian winter conditions.

There were differences in the intensity of infection related to age for both Giardia and Cryptosporidium. Cryptosporidium positive dogs were on average younger than Cryptosporidium negative dogs, consistent with previous knowledge about Cryptosporidium and Giardia infections in dogs. Giardia is more frequently found in preadult and adult dogs, and shedding of Giardia cysts can last for months, whereas Cryptosporidium oocyst shedding usually only lasts a few weeks [49]. Interestingly, 50.7% of the Giardia positive dogs had the highest level of intensity of infection (3+), whereas only 16.7% of the Cryptosporidium positive dogs were in the same category. Giardia is often considered to cause a 'chronic' infection, with a long period of low cyst excretion, so therefore one would have expected a high number of samples with low cyst numbers. Possibly, the duration of peak shedding for Giardia in dogs is substantially longer (~5 weeks) than for Cryptosporidium (1–2 weeks), as found in calves [49]. Moreover, the peak intensity of Cryptosporidium oocyst excretion may have occurred before the individual sampling of the dogs commenced, when they were about 3 months old.

Owners of Giardia positive dogs were recommended to treat their dogs with fenbendazole, which is one of several treatment options for Giardia infections in dogs, and this might have reduced the Giardia prevalence. However, data on whether the owners actually treated their dogs were not collected and despite this treatment recommendation, some of the dogs had Giardia in more than one sample. This could either be re-infection(s) or persistent infections. Fenbendazole is reported to have good effect against Giardia infections in dogs [5052]. However, the time intervals between the samplings in the current studies (1, 2 and 6 months) were sufficient for the dogs to be re-infected between sampling occasions. Many of the efficacy studies performed on fenbendazole treatment of giardiasis in dogs have only followed the dogs for 3 days up to 4 weeks after treatment and have reported treatment efficiency to range between variable to good [50, 51, 53, 52]. Decock et al. (2003) [51] evaluated 4 different treatments against canine giardiasis and found that 18 days post treatment, all but one of the dogs in the different groups were positive again. Metronidazole gave the best results; all 6 dogs were negative on day 10 post treatment, but by day 18 they were all shedding cysts again. Both Decock et al. [51] and Beelitz et al. [50] reported re-infection after treatment (within 18 and 28 days post treatment) with different compounds and treatment regimens. The long term effects of treatment on giardiasis status are unknown. O'Handley et al. (2000) [42] found that calves treated against Giardia with fenbendazole were reinfected within 2 weeks after treatment, and that this pattern of reinfection was consistent after every treatment period.

Since genotyping of Giardia and Cryptosporidium had not been established at our laboratory at the time of the investigation, information about which Cryptosporidium species/genotypes and Giardia species/assemblages were present in these samples is lacking. More recently, our laboratory has identified Cryptosporidium cani s from three Cryptosporidium positive dog samples. Five Giardia positive samples from dogs have also been genotyped; 3 were closely related to G. duodenalis specific host dog (Assemblage C) and 2 were G. duodenalis Assemblage B (unpublished data).


Both Cryptosporidium and Giardia are common in Norwegian dogs, with Cryptosporidium being more prevalent than Giardia. Since Cryptosporidium canis from dogs can infect humans, and dogs can harbour Giardia duodenalis of the zoonotic genotypes of Assemblages A and B, further studies with genotyping of isolates of these parasites from Norwegian dogs are necessary to evaluate their public health significance in Norway.


  1. 1.

    Fayer R: Cryptosporidium: a water-borne zoonotic parasite. Vet Parasitol. 2004, 126: 37-56. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.09.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Thompson RCA: The zoonotic significance and molecular epidemiology of Giardia and giardiasis. Vet Parasitol. 2004, 126: 15-35. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.09.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hamnes IS, Gjerde BK, Robertson LJ: Prevalence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in dairy calves in three areas of Norway. Vet Parasitol. 2006, 140: 204-216. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.03.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hamnes IS, Gjerde BK, Robertson L, Vikøren T, Handeland K: Prevalence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in free-ranging wild cervids in Norway. Vet Parasitol. 2006, 141: 30-41. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hamnes IS, Gjerde BK, Forberg T, Robertson LJ: Occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in suckling piglets in Norway. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 144: 222-233. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.10.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hamnes IS, Gjerde BK, Forberg T, Robertson LJ: Occurrence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in Norwegian red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Vet Parasitol. 2007, 143: 347-353. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.08.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cacciò SM, Thompson RCA, McLauchlin J, Smith HV: Unravelling Cryptosporidium and Giardia epidemiology. Trends Parasitol. 2005, 21: 430-437. 10.1016/

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fayer R, Santin M, Xiao L: Cryptosporidium bovis n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporiidae) in cattle (Bos taurus). J Parasitol. 2005, 91: 624-629. 10.1645/GE-3435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Xiao L, Fayer R, Ryan U, Upton SJ: Cryptosporidium taxonomy: recent advances and implications for public health. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004, 17: 72-97. 10.1128/CMR.17.1.72-97.2004.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fayer R, Trout JM, Xiao L, Morgan UM, Lai AA, Dubey JP: Cryptosporidium canis n. sp. from domestic dogs. J Parasitol. 2001, 87: 1415-1422.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hajdušek O, Ditrich O, Šlapeta J: Molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in animal and human hosts from the Czech Republic. Vet Parasitol. 2004, 122: 183-192. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.04.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Irwin PJ: Companion animal parasitology: a clinical perspective. Int J Parasitol. 2002, 32: 581-593. 10.1016/S0020-7519(01)00361-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Monis PT, Thompson RCA: Cryptosporidium and Giardia-zoonoses: fact or fiction?. Infect Genet Evol. 2003, 3: 233-244. 10.1016/j.meegid.2003.08.003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Thompson RCA: Giardiasis as a re-emerging infectious disease and its zoonotic potential. Int J Parasitol. 2000, 30: 1259-1267. 10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00127-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Robertson L, Gjerde B: Effects of the Norwegian winter environment on Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts. Microbial Ecol. 2004, 47: 359-365. 10.1007/s00248-003-0003-5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Berilli F, Di Cave D, De Liberat C, Franco A, Scaramozzino P, Oecchia P: Genotype characterization of Giardia duodenalis isolates from domestic and farm animals by SSU-rRNA gene sequencing. Vet Parasitol. 2004, 122: 193-196. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.04.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ponce-Macotela M, Peralta-Abarca GE, Martínez-Gordillo MN: Giardia intestinalis and other zoonotic parasites: prevalence in adult dogs from the southern part of Mexico City. Vet Parasitol. 2005, 131: 1-4. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.03.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Van Keulen H, Macechko PT, Wade S, Schaaf S, Wallis PM, Erlandsen SL: Presence of human Giardia in domestic, farm and wild animals, and environmental samples suggests a zoonotic potential for giardiasis. Vet Parasitol. 2002, 108: 97-107. 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00181-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Traub RJ, Robertson ID, Irwin PJ, Mencke N, Thompson RCA: Canine gastrointestinal parasitic zoonoses in India. Trends Parasitol. 2005, 21: 42-48. 10.1016/

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Anderson KA, Brooks AS, Morrison AL, Reid-Smith RJ, Wayne Martin S, Benn DM, Peregrine AS: Impact of Giardia vaccination on asymptomatic Giardia infections in dogs at a research facility. Can Vet J. 2004, 45: 924-930.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Trangerud C, Sande RD, Rørvik AM, Indrebø A, Grøndalen J: A new type of radiographic remodelling in the distal radial and ulnar metaphysic in 54 Newfoundland dogs. Vet Radiology & Ultrasound. 2005, 46: 108-113. 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2005.00022.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Trangerud C, Grøndalen J, Indrebø A, Tverdal A, Ropstad E, Moe L: A longitudinal study on growth and growth variables in dogs of four large breeds raised in domestic environments. J Anim Sci. 2007, 85: 76-83. 10.2527/jas.2006-354.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Trangerud C, Meuwissen T, Ropstad e, Indrebø A, Grøndalen J, Moe L: Risk factors affecting metaphyseal irregularities in the radius and ulna of growing Newfoundland dogs. J Anim Sci. 2007, doi:10.2527/jas.2006-838,

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Olson ME, Gusellle NJ, O'Handley RM, Swift ML, McAllister TA, Jelinski MD, Morck DW: Giardia and Cryptosporidium in dairy calves in British Columbia. Can Vet J. 1997, 38: 703-706.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Barutzki D, Schaper R: Endoparasites in dogs and cats in Germany 1999–2002. Parasitol Res. 2003, 90: 148-150. 10.1007/s00436-003-0922-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Causapé AC, Quílez J, Sánchez-Acedo C, del Cacho E: Prevalence of intestinal parasites, including Cryptosporidium parvum, in dogs in Zaragoza city, Spain. Vet Parasitol. 1996, 67: 161-167. 10.1016/S0304-4017(96)01033-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Díaz V, Campos M, Lozano J, Manãs I, González K: Aspects of giardiosis in Granada province (Southern Spain). Vet Parasitol. 1996, 64: 171-176. 10.1016/0304-4017(95)00923-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Fontanarrosa MF, Vezzani D, Basabe J, Eiras DF: An epidemiological study of gastrointestinal parasites of dogs from Southern Greater Buenos Aires (Argentina): Age, gender, breed, mixed infections, and seasonal and spatial patterns. Vet Parasitol. 2006, 136: 283-295. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.11.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hackett T, Lappin MR: Prevalence of enteric pathogens in dogs in North-Central Colorado. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2003, 39: 52-56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jacobs SR, Forrester CPR, Yang A: A survey of the prevalence of Giardia in dogs presented to Canadian veterinary practices. Can Vet J. 2001, 42: 45-46.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kirkpatrick CE: Epizootiology of endoparasitic infections in pet dogs and cats presented to a veterinary teaching hospital. Vet Parasitol. 1988, 30: 113-124. 10.1016/0304-4017(88)90158-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Papini R, Gorini G, Spaziani A, Cardini G: Survey on giardiosis in shelter dog populations. Vet Parasitol. 2005, 128: 333-339. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.12.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Abe N, Sawano Y, Yamada K, Kimata Iseki M: Cryptosporidium infections in dogs in Osaka, Japan. Vet Parasitol. 2002, 108: 185-193. 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00204-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Chermette R, Blondel S: Cryptospordiosis des carnivore domestiques, resultants preliminaires en France. Bull Soc Fr Parasitol. 1989, 7: 31-36.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Huber F, Bomfim TCB, Gomes RS: Comparison between natural infections by Cryptosporidium sp., Giardia sp. in dogs in two living situations in the West Zone of the municipality of Rio de Janeiro. Vet Parasitol. 2005, 130: 69-72. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.03.012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Johnston J, Gasser RB: Copro-parasitological survey of dogs in southern Victoria. Aust Vet Pract. 1993, 23: 127-131.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lloyd S, Smith J: Pattern of Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst excretion by experimentally infected dogs. Int J Parasitol. 1997, 27: 799-801. 10.1016/S0020-7519(97)00041-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Fayer R, Santin M, Trout JM, Greiner E: Prevalence of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium found in 1–2-year old dairy cattle in the eastern United States. Vet Parasitol. 2006, 135: 105-112. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Feng Y, Ortega Y, He G, Das P, Xu M, Zhang X, Fayer R, Gatei W, Cama V, Xiao L: Wide geographic distribution of Cryptosporidium bovis and the deer-like genotype in bovines. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 144: 1-9. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Langkjær RB, Vigre H, Enemark HL, Maddox-Hyttel C: Molecular and phylogenetic characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia from pigs and cattle in Denmark. Parasitol. 2007, 134: 339-350. 10.1017/S0031182006001533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Santín M, Trout JM, Xiao L, Zhou L, Greiner E, Fayer R: Prevalence and age-related variation of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in dairy calves. Vet Parasitol. 2004, 122: 103-117. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.03.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    O'Handley RM, Cocwill C, Jelinski M, McAllister TA, Olson ME: Effects of repeat fenbendazole treatment in dairy calves with giardiasis on cyst excretion, clinical signs and production. Vet Parasitol. 2000, 89: 209-218. 10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00200-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Thompson RCA, Monis PT: Variation in Giardia: implications for taxonomy and epidemiology. Adv Parasitol. 2004, 58: 69-137.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bianciardi P, Papini R, Giuliani G, Cardini G: Prevalences of Giardia antigen in stool samples from dogs and cats. Rev Med Vet. 2004, 155: 417-421.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Nolan TJ, Smith G: Time series analysis of the prevalence of endoparasitic infections in cats and dogs presented to a veterinary teaching hospital. Vet Parasitol. 1995, 59: 87-96. 10.1016/0304-4017(94)00742-U.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Norwegian Kennel Club, 2005. NKK_hund_kommune2005. []

  47. 47.

    Statistics Norway 2006. Statistical Yearbook, Statistisk Sentralbyrå. []

  48. 48.

    Robertson LJ, Gjerde BK: Fate of Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in the Norwegian aquatic environment over winter. Microbial Ecol. 2006, 52: 597-602. 10.1007/s00248-006-9005-4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Olson ME, O'Handley RM, Ralston BJ, McAllister TA, Thompson RCA: Update on Cryptosporidium and Giardia infections in cattle. Trends Parasitol. 2004, 20: 185-191. 10.1016/

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Beelitz P, Leonhard S, Pfister K: Giardia-Infektionen bei Hunden in Deutchland: Bewertung von Behandlungsregimen in unterschiedlinchen Haltungsformen und Prävalenz. Prakt Tierartz. 2006, 87: 597-603.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Decock C, Cadiergues MC, Roques M, Franc M: Evaluation of four treatments of canine giardiasis. Rev Med Vet-Toulouse. 2003, 154: 763-766.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Zajac AM, LaBranche TP, Donoghue AR, Chu TC: Efficacy of fenbendazole in the treatment of experimental Giardia infections in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1998, 51: 61-63.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    NamSoo K, SeunKi C: The efficacy of albendazole, fenbendazole and metrondiazole for treatment of canine Giardia. J Veterinary Clinics. 2003, 22: 239-243.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors wish to thank all the breeders and dog owners who provided samples from their dogs, and Jorunn Grøndalen, Lars Moe and Line Ellingsen at the Department of Companion Animal Sciences at the Norwegian School of Veterinary Science for providing us access to their network of breeders and dog owners. We also want to thank technician Asbjørg Husdal for help with processing of the samples. This study was partly funded by a grant from The Norwegian Research Council.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inger S Hamnes.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

All three authors were involved in the planning of the study. ISH performed the faecal exams, performed the statistical analyses, drafting and revising of the manuscript. BKG and LJR have been involved in drafting and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors have approved the manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamnes, I.S., Gjerde, B.K. & Robertson, L.J. A longitudinal study on the occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in dogs during their first year of life. Acta Vet Scand 49, 22 (2007).

Download citation


  • Giardiasis
  • Cryptosporidium Oocyst
  • Giardia Cyst
  • Fenbendazole
  • Giardia Infection